Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with Hugo™ RAS using a modified Retzius-Sparing technique: case report and initial experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48193/jmzk5193Keywords:
Hugo TM RAS;, Prostate cancer, Minimally Invasive Surgery,, Retzius-SparingAbstract
Background: currently, the state of robotic surgery in Mexico has shown significant growth in both nationwide availability and the number of certified surgeons. Today, more platforms are available, including the addition of Versius and Hugo™ RAS.
Clinical case: a 64-year-old male with no significant chronic-degenerative history presented with elevated total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 30.20 ng/ml. A transrectal biopsy showed Gleason 6 (3+3). An 18F-PSMA PET-CT showed uptake at the base of the left lobe with SUVmax of 6.3 and in the peripheral zone of the right side at the mid-third with SUVmax of 7.8. There was no evidence of regional lymph node involvement or metastatic disease. A radical prostatectomy assisted by Hugo™ RAS was performed.
Relevance & Discussion: we present a case of high-grade localized prostate cancer treated with a radical prostatectomy using a modified Retzius-sparing technique with the Hugo™ RAS robotic platform. This is a case report and technique description. Conclusion: it is feasible to perform minimally invasive techniques using the new robotic platform now available in Mexico for robot-assisted procedures, with comparable outcomes.
References
Bravi CA, Paciotti M, Sarchi L, Mottaran A, Nocera L, Farinha R, et al. Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Novel Hugo Robotic System: Initial Experience and Optimal Surgical Set-up at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center. European Urology. 2022;82(2): 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.029.
Takahara K, Motonaga T, Nakamura W, Saruta M, Nukaya T, Takenaka M, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the HugoTM robot-assisted surgery system: A single-center initial experience in Japan. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery. 2024;17(3): e13342. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.13342.
Ragavan N, Bharathkumar S, Chirravur P, Sankaran S. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Utilizing Hugo RAS Platform: Initial Experience. Journal of Endourology. 2023;37(2): 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0461.
Totaro A, Scarciglia E, Marino F, Campetella M, Gandi C, Ragonese M, et al. Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with the Novel Surgical Robotic Platform HugoTM RAS: Monocentric First Series of 132 Cases Reporting Surgical, and Early Functional and Oncological Outcomes at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center. Cancers. 2024;16(8): 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081602.
Ou YC, Ou HC, Juan YS, Narasimhan R, Mottrie A, Weng WC, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hugo RAS system: The pioneer experience in Taiwan and Northeast Asia. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS. 2023; e2577. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2577.
Alfano CG, Moschovas MC, Montagne V, Soto I, Porter J, Patel V, et al. Implementation and outcomes of Hugo(TM) RAS System in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. International Braz J Urol: Official Journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. 2023;49(2): 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.9902.
Shepherd A, Jaffer A, Bruce A, Chia D, Dasgupta P, Challacombe B. Early clinical evaluation of the Hugo robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) for performing radical prostatectomy: an IDEAL stage 2 study. BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies. 2025;7(1): e000360. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000360.
Ou HC, Marian L, Li CC, Juan YS, Tung MC, Shih HJ, et al. Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy by the Hugo Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System and the da Vinci System: A Comparison between the Two Platforms. Cancers. 2024;16(6): 1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16061207.
Martini A, Falagario UG, Villers A, Dell’Oglio P, Mazzone E, Autorino R, et al. Contemporary Techniques of Prostate Dissection for Robot-assisted Prostatectomy. European Urology. 2020;78(4): 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.017.
Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M, Diaz M, Tallman C, Abdollah F, et al. Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches. The Journal of Urology. 2018;199(5): 1210–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.115.
Nyarangi-Dix JN, Görtz M, Gradinarov G, Hofer L, Schütz V, Gasch C, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer. BMC urology. 2019;19(1): 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0550-9.
Corona-Montes VE, Barzallo-Sánchez JL, Sánchez-Núñez JE, Gómez-López RN, Pérez-García A. Prostatectomía radical asistida por robot con abordaje Retzius-Sparing vs. Frankfurt modificado: comparación de resultados a 1 año de seguimiento. Cirugía y Cirujanos. 2023; 12607. https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.23000355.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Mexicana de Urología

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

